My questions:
1. Why did he resign in just 49 days?
The usual answer is Lokpal which now looks as nothing but farce. I'll tell you why...
a) There was already a lokayukta so a new Lokpal was not that necessary. Only necessity was the implementation of the existing system and maybe some changes according to the need.
b) There were other pressing and important matters as well which should have been given the attention.
c) He subsidised electricity on a whim without discussions with the operations and hence was rebuked by the HC and the decision had to be revoked. He couldn't fulfil his glorified claims.
2. Why I call him nautanki:
a) He sat on a dharna against his own government. Who in the world does that? Thank god he was just a CM and the coverage was limited to India. God forbid, had he been a PM and had he done something similar, the world would have been laughing at us.
b) Before elections he had 370 pages of proof against Sheila Dikshit, which vanished after elections. After elections, when confronted, he shamelessly asked for the proof from the people.
c) He and his MLAs took autos, buses and trains to assembly daily, until they won the trust vote. After that they took the innovas happily. (I wouldn't have said a thing had they taken it from the first day itself. It was meant for them, but the nautanki of autos and buses were too much)
d) Same goes for his bungalow. Why did he say, before elections, that he won't take any amenities and yet hogged two bungalows after becoming chief minister?
3. Now the new things:
a) The party claiming to expose all the corrupts does not know where it's funds come from? I would have agreed to this point had I not seen the video of Yogendra Yadav claiming that every donation of 10 lakhs and above is inspected by their PAC. If they did not inspect it, wasn't that statement just drama?
b) when asked about this all they had as answer was all the parties are corrupt. Weren't people relying on you on the same premise that all others are corrupt, you are not?
c) They say all parties are communal yet they ask for support from Muslims from Imam, publicises that he is going to visit all the temples, gurudwaras and churches.
d) When they see that the support from Imam has backfired, they refuse it while they had happily accepted Owaisi's support earlier.
e) They accuse everybody of attacking the individual and yet they go on and attack Kiran Bedi particularly.
f) There is no thought put in the manifesto of AAP.
i. They promise 15 lakhs cctv camera. The cost of that will be about Rs. 2.4 lakh crore. Delhi annual budget is about 40000 crores.
ii. The number of new schools they have promised will require so much land that it will overshoot the total area of Delhi.
These points make it clear to me that they have no vision for the people but for Arvind Kejriwal's personal ambitions. Should I delve more into this?
1. Why did he resign in just 49 days?
The usual answer is Lokpal which now looks as nothing but farce. I'll tell you why...
a) There was already a lokayukta so a new Lokpal was not that necessary. Only necessity was the implementation of the existing system and maybe some changes according to the need.
b) There were other pressing and important matters as well which should have been given the attention.
c) He subsidised electricity on a whim without discussions with the operations and hence was rebuked by the HC and the decision had to be revoked. He couldn't fulfil his glorified claims.
2. Why I call him nautanki:
a) He sat on a dharna against his own government. Who in the world does that? Thank god he was just a CM and the coverage was limited to India. God forbid, had he been a PM and had he done something similar, the world would have been laughing at us.
b) Before elections he had 370 pages of proof against Sheila Dikshit, which vanished after elections. After elections, when confronted, he shamelessly asked for the proof from the people.
c) He and his MLAs took autos, buses and trains to assembly daily, until they won the trust vote. After that they took the innovas happily. (I wouldn't have said a thing had they taken it from the first day itself. It was meant for them, but the nautanki of autos and buses were too much)
d) Same goes for his bungalow. Why did he say, before elections, that he won't take any amenities and yet hogged two bungalows after becoming chief minister?
3. Now the new things:
a) The party claiming to expose all the corrupts does not know where it's funds come from? I would have agreed to this point had I not seen the video of Yogendra Yadav claiming that every donation of 10 lakhs and above is inspected by their PAC. If they did not inspect it, wasn't that statement just drama?
b) when asked about this all they had as answer was all the parties are corrupt. Weren't people relying on you on the same premise that all others are corrupt, you are not?
c) They say all parties are communal yet they ask for support from Muslims from Imam, publicises that he is going to visit all the temples, gurudwaras and churches.
d) When they see that the support from Imam has backfired, they refuse it while they had happily accepted Owaisi's support earlier.
e) They accuse everybody of attacking the individual and yet they go on and attack Kiran Bedi particularly.
f) There is no thought put in the manifesto of AAP.
i. They promise 15 lakhs cctv camera. The cost of that will be about Rs. 2.4 lakh crore. Delhi annual budget is about 40000 crores.
ii. The number of new schools they have promised will require so much land that it will overshoot the total area of Delhi.
These points make it clear to me that they have no vision for the people but for Arvind Kejriwal's personal ambitions. Should I delve more into this?
